• Back to home
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

Guide to Marine Mammals and Turtles of the U.S. Pacific

Field guide to marine mammals and sea turtles of Hawaii, California, Oregon, Washington Learn more...

Bookstore home •

This is part of Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and Solutions

Description

We examined several strategies to reduce seabird bycatch, primarily of Common Murres (Uria aalge) and Rhinoceros Auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata), in a coastal salmon drift gillnet fishery in Puget Sound, Washington (USA). Our goal was a significant reduction in seabird bycatch without a concomitant reduction in target catch or an increase in the bycatch of any other species. We compared fish catch and seabird bycatch in nets modified to include visual alerts (highly visible netting in the upper net) or acoustic alerts (pingers) to traditional monofilament nets set throughout the normal fishing hours over a five-week fishing season. Catch and bycatch varied significantly as a function of gear. With monofilament controls, murres responded to both visual and acoustic alerts; auklets and sockeye salmon responded to deeper visual alerts only. Seabird abundance varied across multiple temporal scales: interannually, within fishing season, and within day. At the interannual level seabird entanglement was linked to regional abundance on the fishing grounds, a pattern which broke down at the local level. Within season, sockeye and murre abundance were negatively correlated, suggesting that if fishery openings were scheduled on peak abundance of the target species, seabird bycatch would be significantly reduced as a function of increased target fishing efficiency. Finally, both sockeye catch and auklet entanglement were highest at dawn, whereas murre entanglement was high at both dawn and dusk. Our results identify three complementary tools to reduce seabird bycatch in the Puget Sound drift gillnet fishery—gear modifications, abundance-based fishery openings, and time of day restrictions—for a possible reduction in seabird bycatch of up to 70-75% without a significant reduction in target fishing efficiency. Although these tools are based on local conditions and will thus vary among years and locations, all might be exportable to other coastal gillnet fisheries worldwide.

Item details

• Item number: AK-SG-01-01i
• Year: 2001
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4027/sbtrs.2001.09

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

YouTube

Last modified 29 August 2016, 8:33am AKDT. For website issues, contact Alaska Sea Grant web coordinator.
For program information, contact Alaska Sea Grant, PO Box 755040, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99775-5040. sea.grant@alaska.edu, (907) 474-7086.

Alaska Sea Grant at the University of Alaska Fairbanks is part of the National Sea Grant Program, a division of NOAA.

The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an AA/EO employer and educational institution and prohibits illegal discrimination against any individual: Learn more about UA's notice of nondiscrimination.

HTML 5 || CSS